Ceramics studio storefront
A small-batch ceramics brand moving off a marketplace onto its own store. Product photography carries the brand, so the theme was built to stay out of the way: large imagery,…
- Scope
- Design, Liquid build
- Duration
- 5 weeks
Most agencies hand over a Figma file and leave before the hard part. Softsolo takes a project from first wireframe to live site, so the thing you approved is the thing that ships.
Designed and built natively on
A small-batch ceramics brand moving off a marketplace onto its own store. Product photography carries the brand, so the theme was built to stay out of the way: large imagery,…
A freight team tracking shipments across four systems and a spreadsheet. We mapped the daily workflow first, then designed a single view with the three numbers that actually drive their…
Class schedules were being posted to social media and lost. The site now runs a live timetable the studio manager edits herself, with booking flowing straight through to their existing…
A product with a strong demo and a page that never got people to it. We rebuilt the narrative around the buyer problem rather than the feature list, and shipped…
We would rather be genuinely good at a short list than average across twenty. Everything below is delivered in house.
Research, flows, and interface systems built in Figma with the handoff developers actually need.
Marketing sites and web applications designed and coded by the same team, so the build matches what you approved.
Custom builds rather than a bought theme bent into shape. Your team edits content without breaking layout.
Storefronts built on Liquid so merchandising and campaigns stay in your team's hands after launch.
Webflow builds for teams who want to publish and edit without waiting on a developer for every change.
Being found in Google results, in AI answers, and inside the models people now ask instead of searching.
Practical systems that remove repetitive work between your tools. No chatbot for the sake of it.
Softsolo is a small studio built around a single idea: the people who design the work should be the same people who ship it.
Most agency projects change hands halfway. A studio designs it, a separate team builds it, and the details that made the design good quietly disappear in between. Nobody is accountable for the finished thing, and the client absorbs the difference.
We kept the team deliberately small so that handoff never happens. The designer sits in the build decisions and the developer sits in the design reviews, which means what you approve is what goes live. It is also why most of our work arrives from teams whose previous build stalled somewhere between the two.
We are not trying to be the biggest agency in the market. We would rather be the one you can actually reach on a Tuesday afternoon when something needs deciding.
A working session to define the problem, the success metric, and what is explicitly out of scope. You get a fixed brief before any money moves.
Structure first, then interface. You review real screens on a schedule you can plan around.
Development starts on the platform you will actually run, by the people who were in the design reviews.
Deploy, verify, hand over documented. Then we tune against real numbers rather than guessing.
Including the two rows where we are plainly not the right answer. If a comparison table never says that, it is a sales page rather than a comparison.
Running a project above roughly $25k, or needing a team of ten? A larger agency will serve you better and we will happily point you to one.
I scope every project personally and stay on it through launch. If something is going wrong you hear it from me early, not at the deadline.
A project is not finished when the design is approved. It is finished when it is live, fast, and your own team can edit it without calling us.
It depends on scope, platform, and how much research the work needs. Tell us the goal and the deadline and we will give you a realistic range in the first reply, before any call. After scoping you get a written proposal with deliverables, timeline, and a fixed price. The number in the proposal is the number you pay.
A fair question, and we would rather answer it than fill the page with logos you cannot verify. What we offer instead is a fixed written scope before payment, full ownership of source files and repository at launch, and a direct line to the people doing the work. Judge us on the scoping call, which costs you nothing.
Most agencies hand you a Figma file and a recommendation. The build then goes to a separate team who did not sit in the design decisions, and quality drops in that gap. We design and build with the same people, so what you approve is what ships.
A focused landing page or store build usually runs two to four weeks. A full site with research, custom design, and development typically runs six to twelve. We commit to a date in the proposal and flag risk early rather than at the deadline.
Yes. We take on redesigns, rescues of half finished builds, and support alongside an in house team. For existing sites we audit first, so we know what is worth keeping before recommending anything be replaced.
Scope and price are fixed in writing, so overruns are our problem rather than yours. You own every file from day one, so if you ever want to take the work elsewhere nothing is held hostage.
Send the goal and the deadline. You get a straight answer on scope, cost, and whether we are the right fit, usually within one working day.
Book a scoping call